Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 25, 2024Open Access

Validating a lutetium frequency reference

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KAK. J. ArnoldSBScott BustabadQQQin Qichen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Arnold et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6dabdb6db643587657554https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.16414
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lu+ optical frequency references with accuracy verified at the 19th digit2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2A clock with $8\times10^{-19}$ systematic uncertainty2024 · 204 citations
  3. 3Theoretical calculations of energy levels and transitions for Neutral Lutetium2025
  4. 4<sup>171</sup>Yb<sup>+</sup> optical clock with 2.2 × 10<sup>−18</sup> systematic uncertainty and absolute frequency measurements2024 · 33 citations
  5. 5Clock with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> Systematic Uncertainty2024 · 7 citations