Forestry-waste biochar was tested as a commercial substrate (peat:lapillus 1:1 v/v) amendment in growing tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Substrates were 0% (control), 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% (% v/v) biochar-enriched and were characterized for their textural and physicochemical properties. After harvesting, tomato production (i.e., plant and fruits), quality (e.g., nutrition and nutraceutics), and safety (i.e., biochar-related pollutants) were assessed according to the different growing media. 10-to-40% biochar-enriched substrates only exceeded the pH threshold set by L.D. 75/2010. Ni and Mn exhibited a similar trend between substrates and fruits, while Cr, Pb, and Cd were absent. Plant biomass increased (up to 11–29%) according to biochar content, which conversely diminished fruit production (∼25–60% reduction). Only acenaphthene exhibited an increasing profile (11–12 μg kg–1) according to the treatments, nevertheless complying with the European regulations. PLS-DA confirmed practice suitability by substrate–crop correlation, providing prediction models for quality and safety assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bini et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: