Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic equilibrium models based on present value computation not only imply that returns are predictable but also generate particular short-term patterns of predictability in asset returns. I take advantage of this to construct a set of tests of equilibrium generated predictability (EGP). I apply the tests to document two puzzles: First, option-implied or realized measures of volatility ought to predict returns but do not; and second, the variance risk premium (VRP) predicts returns but only at long horizons. VRP fails the tests of EGP as the term structure of predictable variation is inconsistent with an equilibrium interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjørn Eraker (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: