Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Community ecology and sociobiology share a number of problems (e.g. understanding part-to-whole relationships), so sharing methods may be beneficial. In this paper, we re-analyze a large social network database for Camponotus fellah ants, from the perspective of keystone individuals, based on methods developed in community ecology. We study different network types for six colonies, over a time series of 10 days. These include the total network of weighted interactions, the subnetworks for the castes and the subnetworks for Queen-linked and Queen-independent individuals. We perform time-independent (i.e. average values) and temporal (i.e. trends) analyses. The most commonly used global network metrics showed high variability in time but no clear trends. Yet, the variability of a network centrality index (topological importance, TI), developed earlier in community ecology, shows clear increase in each colony over time, suggesting the emergence of keystone individuals as a general tendency in all studied ant colonies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovács et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: