Morphological classification conveys abundant information on the formation, evolution, and environment of galaxies. In this work, we refine the two-step galaxy morphological classification framework ({ USmorph}), which employs a combination of unsupervised machine learning (UML) and supervised machine learning (SML) techniques, along with a self-consistent and robust data preprocessing step. The updated method is applied to the galaxies with Imag<25 at $0.2<z<1.2$ in the COSMOS field. Based on their HST/ACS I-band images, we classify them into five distinct morphological types: spherical (SPH, 15,200), early-type disk (ETD, 17,369), late-type disk (LTD, 21,143), irregular disk (IRR, 28,965), and unclassified (UNC, 17,129). In addition, we have conducted both parametric and nonparametric morphological measurements. For galaxies with stellar masses exceeding 10⁹M_, a gradual increase in effective radius from SPHs to IRRs is observed, accompanied by a decrease in the S\'{e}rsic index. Nonparametric morphologies reveal distinct distributions of galaxies across the Gini-M₂₀ and $C-A$ parameter spaces for different categories. Moreover, different categories exhibit significant dissimilarity in their G₂ and Ψ distributions. We find morphology to be strongly correlated with redshift and stellar mass. The consistency of these classification results with expected correlations among multiple parameters underscores the validity and reliability of our classification method, rendering it a valuable tool for future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: