Compounds with a 1,2,4–triazole scaffold serve an essential role in organic synthesis, particularly in the synthesis of bioactive organic compounds; thus, the development of new approaches for modifying this scaffold is a very interesting framework of this study. To contribute to the development of an efficient method for the conversion of anticancer triazoles, a novel series of benzimidazole based 1,2,4‐triazoles was designed and synthesized. All the newly synthesized derivatives were characterized by NMR ( 1 H & 13 C), FT–IR and mass spectrometry. Among the tested compounds, hybrids 5 b , 5 g exhibited exceptional anticancer susceptibilities with IC 50 =8.8±0.9, 9.2±1.5 μM against the tested HCA‐7cancer cell line. Anticancer profiles showed that compounds 5 d , 5 i had better anticancer inhibitory potency against a breast cancer cell line MCF‐7with IC 50 values 8.3±2.1, 10.6±1.2 μM, whereas 5 d , and 5 g showed potent anticancer activity against colorectal cancer cell line HT29 with IC 50 values 7.1±±0.9, 7.7±1.2 μM respectively. From docking results, 5 d demonstrated highly stable binding amino acids LeuA : 2247, GlyA : 2449, SerA : 2409, HisA : 2379, AspA : 2373, LysA : 2318, IleA : 2317, IleA : 2246, IleA : 2412, AlaA : 2410, GlnA : 2452, AsnA : 2245, TyrA : 2243, and HisA : 2448, which play a crucial role enabling optimal ligand binding in a crystal structure tyrosine phosphatase mutated in colorectal cancer (PDB: 1WCH). Furthermore, the physicochemical and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) filtration molecular properties, estimation of bioactivity, and toxicity scores of these scaffolds were evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandrakar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: