⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

April 23, 2024American Journal of Perinatology

Exploring the Limits of Artificial Intelligence for Referencing Scientific Articles

Emily M. Graf Jordan A. McKinney Alexander Dye Lifeng Lin Luis Sanchez‐Ramos

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability of three artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots (ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Chatsonic) in generating accurate references from existing obstetric literature.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Graf et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6df92b6db64358765af11 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786033

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A reality check on chatbot-generated references in global health research2024 · 4 citations
2Assessing the Performance of 8 AI Chatbots in Bibliographic Reference Retrieval: Grok and DeepSeek Outperform ChatGPT, but None are Entirely AccurateOriginal Research · 2026 · 2 citations
3Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT ReferencesOriginal Research · 2023 · 395 citations
4Performance of next-generation AI chatbots in gynecological knowledge assessment: a comparative pilot study of ChatGPT-5, Gemini-3, DeepSeek-V3.2, and Claude-4.5-OpusOriginal Research · 2026 · 3 citations
5An Evaluation of ChatGPT and Bard in the Context of Biological Knowledge Retrieval2024