Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
bias based on how it was programmed (it would refuse to write a poem about Donald Trump but not Joe Biden). 8 Within a short time of the launch of ChatGPT, we conducted an online anonymous survey (6-17 th February 2023). 9It consisted of nine multiple choice questions to find out regarding the use of ChatGPT among doctors vs other professions.Of the 210 participants, 157 were doctors, and 53 from other professions.Very interestingly, there was a good understanding regarding how ChatGPT would influence their professional career.The majority of the doctors (52.2%; 82/157) expected a positive impact on their work (vs 37.7% (20/53) in other professionals; p-value of 0.0006 by two-tailed Fisher's exact test).With respect to Stephen Hawkins' doom prediction (that AI would lead to the demise of the human race), healthcare professionals were quite optimistic that it would not come true (72%; 113/157) vs other professions (67.9%; 36/53; p-value = 0.0188). 9 Judiciary a n d chatGPtThe sleepy town of Cartagena on the northern coast of Colombia was declared a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization heritage site in 1984. 10On 30 th December 2022, it gained one more claim to fame.A hitherto unknown judge, wrote in his judgment that he had used ChatGPT to help him arrive at the verdict. 11,12While it is not clear how much help ChatGPT provided, Judge Garcia was immortalized as the first one to use AI in the judiciary (On 5 th February 2023, my Google search for "Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia resulted in 70 million hits). 13Not all his peers were impressed.Professor Juan David Gutierrez from Rosario University said that the use of ChatGPT by judges is irresponsible and unethical.Still others, like Octavio Tejeiro from the Supreme Court of Colombia
Purvish M. Parikh (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: