Controlled animal trial demonstrates improved survival and metabolic stability in lambs with hemorrhagic shock, highlighting the potential of nonhemoglobin oxygen carriers.
Hemorrhagic shock is a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While whole blood or blood product transfusion is a first-line treatment, maintaining robust supplies presents significant logistical challenges, particularly in austere environments. OMX is a novel nonhemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carrier derived from the H-NOX (heme-nitric oxide/oxygen binding) protein family. Because of their engineered oxygen (O 2 ) affinities, OMX proteins only deliver O 2 to severely hypoxic tissues. Additionally, unlike Hb-based oxygen carriers, OMX proteins do not scavenge nitric oxide in the vasculature. To determine the safety and efficacy of OMX in supporting tissue oxygen delivery and cardiovascular function in a large animal model of controlled hemorrhage, 2–3-week-old lambs were anesthetized, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. Hypovolemic shock was induced by acute hemorrhage to obtain a 50% reduction over 30 min. Vehicle (n = 16) or 400 mg/kg OMX (n = 13) treatment was administered over 15 min. Hemodynamics, arterial blood gases, and laboratory values were monitored throughout the 6-h study. Comparisons between groups were made using t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Fisher’s exact test. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. We found that OMX was well-tolerated and significantly improved lactate and base deficit trends, and hemodynamic indices ( P < 0.05). Median survival time was greater in the OMX-treated group (4.7 vs. 6.0 h, P < 0.003), and overall survival was significantly increased in the OMX-treated group (25% vs. 85%, P = 0.004). We conclude that OMX is well-tolerated and improves metabolic, hemodynamic, and survival outcomes in an ovine model of controlled hemorrhagic shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maltepe et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: