ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop models for predicting prolonged postoperative length of stay (PPOLOS) in lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) by utilizing machine learning techniques. These models aim to offer valuable insights for clinical decision-making.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed a dataset of lung cancer patients who underwent VATS, identifying 25 numerical features and 45 textual features. Three classification machine learning models were developed: XGBoost, random forest, and neural network. The performance of these models was evaluated based on accuracy (ACC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), while the importance of variables was assessed using the feature importance parameter from the random forest model.ResultsOf the 6767 lung cancer patients, 1481 patients (21.8%) experienced a postoperative length of stay greater than 4 days. The majority were male (4111, 60.8%), married (6246, 92.3%), and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (4145, 61.3%). The Random Forest classifier exhibited superior prediction performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792 and accuracy of 0.804. The calibration plot revealed that all three classifiers were in close alignment with the ideal calibration line, indicating high calibration reliability. The five most critical features identified were: Surgical Duration (0.116), Age (0.066), Creatinine (0.062), Hemoglobin (0.058), and Total Protein (0.054).ConclusionsThis study developed and evaluated three machine learning models for predicting PPOLOS in lung cancer patients undergoing VATS. The findings revealed that the Random Forest model is most accurately predicting the PPOLOS. Findings of this study enable the identification of crucial determinants and the formulation of targeted interventions to shorten the length of stay among lung cancer patients after VATS, which contribute to optimize the allocation of healthcare resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: