We identify certain combinatorially defined rational functions which, under the shuffle to Schiffmann algebra isomorphism, map to LLT polynomials in any of the distinguished copies <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi>X</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>⊂</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="script">E</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> Λ(X^{m{,}n}) of the algebra of symmetric functions embedded in the elliptic Hall algebra ℰ of Burban and Schiffmann. As a corollary, we deduce an explicit raising operator formula for the ∇ operator applied to any LLT polynomial. In particular, we obtain a formula for <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msup> <m:mo>∇</m:mo> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:msup> <m:msub> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> ∇ᵐsλ which serves as a starting point for our proof of the Loehr–Warrington conjecture in a companion paper to this one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blasiak et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: