Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To investigate and compare the dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [ 18 F]Alfatide II Imaging and [ 11 C]Methionine ([ 11 C]MET) in orthotopic rat models of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to assess the utility of [ 18 F]Alfatide II in detecting and evaluating neoangiogenesis in GBM. Methods [ 18 F]Alfatide II and [ 11 C]MET were injected into the orthotopic GBM rat models ( n = 20, C6 glioma cells), followed by dynamic PET/MR scans 21 days after surgery of tumor implantation. On the PET image with both radiotracers, the MRI-based volume-of-interest (VOI) was manually delineated encompassing glioblastoma. Time-activity curves were expressed as tumor-to-normal brain ratio (TNR) parameters and PET pharmacokinetic modeling (PKM) performed using 2-tissue-compartment models (2TCM). Immunofluorescent staining (IFS), western blotting and blocking experiment of tumor tissue were performed for the validation. Results Compared to 11 C-MET, [ 18 F]Alfatide II presented a persistent accumulation in the tumor, albeit with a slightly lower SUVmean of 0.79 ± 0.25, and a reduced uptake in the contralateral normal brain tissue, respectively. This resulted in a markedly higher tumor-to-normal brain ratio (TNR) of 18.22 ± 1.91. The time–activity curve (TACs) showed a significant increase in radioactive uptake in tumor tissue, followed by a plateau phase up to 60 min for [ 18 F]Alfatide II (time to peak:255 s) and 40 min for [ 11 C]MET (time to peak:135 s) post injection. PKM confirmed significantly higher K 1 (0.23/0.07) and K 3 (0.26/0.09) in the tumor region compared to the normal brain with [ 18 F]Alfatide II. Compared to [ 11 C]MET imaging, PKM confirmed both significantly higher K 1 /K 2 (1.24 ± 0.79/1.05 ± 0.39) and K 3 /K 4 (11.93 ± 4.28/3.89 ± 1.29) in the tumor region with [ 18 F]Alfatide II. IFS confirmed significant expression of integrin and tumor vascularization in tumor region. Conclusion [ 18 F]Alfatide II demonstrates potential in imaging tumor-associated neovascularization in the context of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), suggesting its utility as a tool for further exploration in neovascular characterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: