Objective: To examine the average change in keratometry’s medically produced astigmatism between lateral andphacoemulsification corneal incisions.Study Design: Randomized Controlled TrialStudy Duration and place of study: Department of Ophthalmology, Khyber Institute of Ophthalmic Sciences HMC,Peshawar. From 20-07- 2020 to 21-01-2021.Materials and Methods: A random allocation process divided 140 cataract patients into two groups. Phacoemulsification was performed using a superior corneal incision in group A and a temporal incision in group B. Baselineand follow-up keratometry readings were used to compute the average astigmatism change.Results: Patient age averaged 49.6 + 5.3 years throughout the research group. Group B patients averaged 50.4 +4.9 years old (p 0.04), whereas group A patients averaged 48.9 + 5.8 years. Group A included 82.9% males and17.1% women, whereas group B had 74.3% men and 25.7% women (p 0.217). Group A’s mean BMI was 24.9+ 3.8 kg/m2, whereas Group B’s was 25.2 + 3.7. A and B had mean baseline BCVAs of 0.8 + 0.2 and 0.8 +0.2, respectively (p 0.858). Keratometry showed group A’s mean baseline astigmatism was 0.2 + 0.06D and groupB’s 0.1 + 0.07 (p 0.614). Keratometry showed that group A’s mean follow-up astigmatism was 1.2 + 0.2D andgroup B’s 1.1 + 0.2 (p 0.836). According to keratometry, group A’s astigmatism changed by 1.0 + 0.17D andgroup B’s by 1.0 + 0.2 (p 0.707).Conclusion: We found no statistically significant difference in mean astigmatism before and after phacoemulsificationin corneal vs temporal incision groups. Our study had a limited sample size and did not account for effect modifiers, thuswe urge additional studies with higher sample sizes and accounting for confounders that may affect patients’ medicallyinduced astigmatism after phacoemulsification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashraf et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: