Monolithic RC frequency references offer attractive integration, cost, and power benefits compared to bulky crystal or MEMS oscillators. However, while the temperature coefficients (TCs) of on-chip MIM capacitors is small (tens of on-chip resistors have large TCs (up to thousands of and process variation, that ultimately limit performance. For a stable RC time constant <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">(τRC)</tex> , CMOS RC frequency references usually require delicate design techniques to compensate for the TC and process spread of the on-chip resistors, commonly implemented by manipulating resistors of different TCs or using high-order polynomial compensation [1]–[3]. Fig. 1 (top-left) shows a conventional practice of TC calibration for <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">τRC</tex> , where a second resistor <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RTrim</tex> with a different TC profile is used to cancel or adjust the first-order TC of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">R_τ</tex> . Due to the high-order TCs of both <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RTrim</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Rτ</tex> , the TC of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">τRC</tex> is still high after such calibration. As a result, high-order batch trimming based on polynomial compensation up to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6ᵗʰ</tex> order is used to reduce the TC of [4]–[6] as shown in Fig. 1 (top-right). However, the residual die-to-die error (DDE) due to process spread after such batch trimming limits the TC to ±200ppm or more [4], while a TC of ±90ppm is achieved at the cost of a compromised supply sensitivity and an increased power overhead [5].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: