Using the top-seeded flux method, monoclinic Er3+:GdPO4 and tetragonal Er3+:YPO4 crystals were grown. Polarized spectral properties of these two crystals with different structures were investigated at room temperature and compared. Peak absorption cross sections of the Er3+:GdPO4 crystal for E//Y polarization and Er3+:YPO4 crystal for π polarization are 1.02 × 10–20 cm2 at 1525 nm and 4.11 × 10–20 cm2 at 1506 nm, respectively. Peak emission cross sections of the Er3+:GdPO4 crystal for E//Y polarization and Er3+:YPO4 crystal for π polarization are 0.88 × 10–20 cm2 at 1525 nm and 2.28 × 10–20 cm2 at 1506 nm, respectively. For the 4I13/2 multiplet of the Er3+:GdPO4 and Er3+:YPO4 crystals, the fluorescence lifetimes are 5.32 and 4.49 ms, and the fluorescence quantum efficiencies are 81 and 95%, respectively. The full widths at half-maximum of the gain spectra of the Er3+:GdPO4 crystal for E//Z polarization and Er3+:YPO4 crystal for π polarization are 60 and 8 nm, respectively, when the inversion parameter is 0.5. Experimental results indicate that the Er3+:YPO4 crystal is a good gain medium of the highly efficient, high-power, and low-threshold 1.55 μm laser, while the Er3+:GdPO4 crystal is a promising gain medium used in broadband tunable and ultrashort pulse 1.55 μm lasers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: