Stable carbon (δ 13 C) and nitrogen (δ 15 N) isotope ratios are widely used in marine food web and habitat use studies. However, lipids are naturally depleted in 13 C relative to proteins and are variable in content, biasing δ 13 C of bulk samples, with consequences for the accuracy of conclusions. This issue can be resolved either by extracting lipids from samples prior to analysis, a resource-intensive process that can also alter δ 15 N, or by estimating lipid-free δ 13 C using one of several equations that differ in degree of sophistication and generalization across taxa. Here, δ 13 C and δ 15 N were measured in bulk and lipid-extracted muscle samples from over 2000 specimens of 28 species of marine invertebrates, fishes, and mammals. Our objectives were to compare the effect of lipid extraction on δ 13 C and δ 15 N across taxa and evaluate the performance of 5 normalization models, overall and using subsets of species, to propose a model to revert lipid-extracted δ 15 N back to their bulk values and to identify the best approach for dealing with lipid-related biases. Lipid extraction caused an uneven enrichment in δ 13 C and δ 15 N across species. Model taxonomic specificity increased estimation accuracy for both isotopes. While models from Logan et al. (2008; J Anim Ecol 77:838-846) and McConnaughey & McRoy (1979; Mar Biol 53:257-262) were the best at predicting lipid-free δ 13 C, a linear model reliably estimated δ 15 N values of lipid-free samples using δ 15 N values of bulk samples. This study presents a method for reliably estimating δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of muscle tissue without resorting to duplicate analyses. This represents a major step toward the harmonization of data sets generated using bulk and lipid-extracted samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouellet et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: