BACKGROUND In contemporary healthcare, patient-centered care has emerged as a pivotal paradigm shift that redefines the traditional physician-centric model. Particularly in the context of cancer care, marked by its intricate nature and emotional impact, there's a pressing requirement to rethink how healthcare is delivered. In this context, Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks (CCCNs) provide a new means of structuring and delivering quality cancer care, recognizing each patient's unique preferences and needs. OBJECTIVE To facilitate this patient-centered approach in practice and advance care quality, the objective of this paper was to establish a consistent definition and framework of patient-centeredness in a CCCN. METHODS A systematic meta-review focusing on generic and oncology-specific dimensions of patient-centeredness, a survey with key stakeholders in CCCNs, and a focus group with patient representatives were conducted. RESULTS A definition and framework of patient-centeredness in CCCNs are presented. The framework comprises eight primary dimensions: Empowering Patients, Engaging and Involving Patients, Treating the Patient as a Unique Person, Enhancing the Therapeutic Relationship, Enhancing a Patient-Centered Culture, Providing Holistic and Specialized Care, Recognizing and Supporting the Healthcare Professional as a Person, and Coordinating Care. Corresponding subdimensions and actionable patient-centered activities support each dimension. CONCLUSIONS The results provide a comprehensive perspective on the complex elements that compose patient-centered care within CCCNs. This contributes to a better understanding and application of patient-centeredness in CCCNs and possibly other contexts. The results presented in this paper aspire to support CCCNs and other healthcare contexts in creating a patient-centered environment where patients feel genuinely heard, valued, and actively engaged in their care decisions. CLINICALTRIAL Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hickmann et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: