⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

April 17, 2024Clinical Oral Implants Research

Accuracy of template‐based guided dental implant placement—An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods

Aura Sium‐Abel Ludger Keilig Istabrak Dörsam Christoph Bourauel

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This study investigates effects of surgical guide manufacturing process on 3D transfer accuracy of planned dental implant position, using three production methods: additive 3D-printed (3DF), subtractive milled (MF), and analog laboratory fabricated templates (LF).

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Sium‐Abel et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6eaccb6db643587665f45 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14272

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparing Accuracy Of Surgical Guides Fabricated By Additive Method (3D Printing) Versus Subtractive Method (Milling by CAD/CAM) for Prosthetically Driven Implant Placement “An In-Vitro Study”2024
2Accuracy of teeth supported 3D printed versus CAD/CAM milled surgical guides used for dental implant placement (In-vitro study)2024
3Assessing the precision of 3D-printed surgical templates in oral implant placement: a comparison of half and full-guided approaches2025
4Comparative evaluation of accuracy of implants placed with thermoplastic and three-dimensional-printed surgical guides: A randomized controlled trial2024 · 3 citations
5Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different <scp>3‐dimensional</scp> printers: <scp>An</scp> in vitro study2024 · 4 citations