We offer design guidelines with a top–down and bottom–up design approach for oxide semiconductor (OS) transistors, optimized for gain cell memory on a logic platform. With high-density, high-bandwidth on-chip gain cell memory, deep neural network (DNN) accelerator execution times can be shortened by 51–66%, by minimizing access to off-chip dynamic random access memory (DRAM). To balance retention time with memory bandwidth (top–down), atomic layer deposition (ALD) indium tin oxide (ITO) transistors are chosen (bottom–up). The experimentally optimized device exhibits low off-state current (2 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">×</tex-math> 10 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">⁻¹⁸</tex-math> A/ <tex-math notation="LaTeX">μ</tex-math> m at <tex-math notation="LaTeX">VGS</tex-math> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$=$</tex-math> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-$</tex-math> 0.5 V), good on-state current (26.8 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">μ</tex-math> A/ <tex-math notation="LaTeX">μ</tex-math> m for power supply <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$<$</tex-math> 2 V), low subthreshold swing (SS) (70 mV/dec), and good mobility (27 cm <tex-math notation="LaTeX">²</tex-math> V <tex-math notation="LaTeX">⁻¹</tex-math> s <tex-math notation="LaTeX">⁻¹</tex-math> ). Using this optimized device, a gain cell memory macro with 64 rows ( WL ) <tex-math notation="LaTeX">×</tex-math> 256 columns ( BL ) is simulated at the 28 nm node operating at <tex-math notation="LaTeX">VDD</tex-math> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$=$</tex-math> 0.9 V. The simulation results show that hybrid OS-Si gain cell memory achieves 0.98 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">×</tex-math> frequency and 3 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">×</tex-math> density of static random access memory (SRAM), and the OS-OS gain cell memory is projected to operate at 0.5 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">×</tex-math> frequency with N times 1.15 <tex-math notation="LaTeX">×</tex-math> density of SRAM with N -layer of 3-D stacking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: