Objective: To evaluate prognostic factors and survival determinants of patients with prostate cancer (PC) admitted to an oncology hospital. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on 3,450 medical records of patients undergoing cancer treatment from 2009 to 2018, with follow-up until 2020, at the Center for High Complexity in Oncology (CACON), Muriaé, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. For paired comparisons, the log-rank test was used. For multivariate analysis, the Cox Proportional Hazards method. Results: From 2009 to 2018, 3,450 patients with PC were identified; the predominant profile of multiracial men (45.9%), with an average age of 72 years, no family history of cancer (39.6%), clinical stage II (57.70%), low Gleason score <=6 (52 .7%) and PSA level <10 ng/ml (40.9%). The probability of survival was estimated at 36, 48, and 60 months. Longer survival was found in men aged <60 - 36 (95% CI: 97); 48 (95% CI: 96); 60 (95% CI: 96). Gleason score: <=6 - 36 (95% CI: 98); 48 (95% CI: 97); 60 (95% CI: 96). Stage I: 36 (95% CI: 99); 48 (95% CI: 99); 60 (95% CI: 99). Initial treatment – Radiotherapy: 36 (95% CI: 97); 48 (95% CI: 96); 60 (95% CI: 96). PSA: <10 (ng/ml) 36 (95% CI: 99); 48 (95% CI: 98); 60 (95% CI: 98). Conclusion: The individuals evaluated in this study had survival rates at 60 months higher than those observed in the national and world average for PC and prognostic factors, age >70 years, stage III and IV, elevated Gleason, and PSA >10 ng/ml. The results allow the use of new early diagnosis and treatment measures in the public network – Unified Health System (SUS), as well as proposing new control strategies and health promotion actions, aiming to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with PC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freitas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: