Striatum constitutes one of the key nodes of the decision-making circuit, with differing roles depending on the striatal localization and both direct and indirect pathway Striatal Projecting Neurons (d- and i-SPNs) populations. In a gambling task adapted to mice, we leveraged a computational characterization of the diversity in cognitive profiles to delve further into the striatal roles in decision-making. Individual decision-making profiles could be described as a combination between archetypal strategies (Optimizers, Risk-averse, Explorers). Such strategies reflected stable differences in the parameters generating decisions (sensitivity to reward magnitude, to risk or to punishment) derived from a reinforcement-learning fit of animal choices. Using a chemogenetic method, we found that dorsomedial striatum (DMS) neurons had the most significant impact on decision-making, while Nucleus accumbens (NAc) had a minor effect and dorsolateral striatum (DLS) had none. Specifically, d- SPNs reduce risk aversion by enhancing the perceived value of a risky choice in mice. On the other hand, i-SPNs amplified the importance of large gains, exerting opposite effects on mice depending on their decision-making profiles. Hence, we propose that striatal manipulations exert profile- dependent effects on choices because striatal subpopulations affect distinct parameters that interact to generate decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: