Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The politics of disarmament in North Korea and Iran is a complex interplay of global power dynamics, regional security concerns, and the pursuit of national interests. Both nations' endeavours to develop nuclear capabilities have spurred intense international scrutiny, prompting multifaceted negotiations and diplomatic efforts to curb their nuclear programmes. North Korea's persistent pursuit of nuclear capabilities has sparked global tensions, leading to extensive diplomatic engagements involving key stakeholders. Despite intermittent breakthroughs, achieving complete denuclearization remains elusive, reflecting the challenges of negotiating with a regime known for its unpredictability. Similarly, Iran's nuclear ambitions have positioned it at the heart of a protracted diplomatic standoff. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme but faced complications following the US withdrawal and subsequent sanctions, highlighting the intricate dynamics of geopolitical interests and regional rivalry. The quest for disarmament in both countries navigates a complex web of historical animosities, domestic politics, and security concerns. Achieving meaningful progress requires delicate diplomacy, fostering trust, addressing underlying security issues, and offering credible incentives for disarmament. Understanding the politics of disarmament in North Korea and Iran requires a nuanced comprehension of global power shifts, regional complexities, and the delicate balance between national sovereignty and international obligations. Resolving these challenges demands sustained multilateral engagement and a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the intricate interdependencies shaping global security.
Nyenwe et al. (Wed,) studied this question.