In the absence of an official statement about a rumor, people may expose the truth behind such rumor through their responses on social media. Due to the varying relevance of responses in exposing hidden suspicious points within a rumor claim, it is crucial to prioritize those with higher relevance, rather than considering every responding tweets. As for the multi-modal rumor detection, an effective approach for evaluating relevance is aligning responses with the different modalities of the rumor claim in a fine-grained manner. However, owing to the substantial volume of response tweets, it is both costly and redundant to align all responses with the multi-modal claim. In this paper, we propose a novel two-stage model, termed Focal Reasoning Model (FoRM) , to select critical responses for multi-modal rumor detection. More specifically, our FoRM consists of two primary elements: coarse-grained selection and fine-grained reasoning. The coarse-grained selection component employs post-level features of responses to initialize a relevant score for each. Based on these scores, we preserve the responses with higher scores as the candidate ones for subsequent reasoning. Within the fine-grained reasoning component, we develop a relation attention module to investigate fine-grained relationships, specifically token-to-token and token-to-object connections, between the preserved responses and the multi-modal claim, with the goal of discovering valuable clues. Extensive experiments have been conducted on three real-world datasets, and the results demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms all the baselines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: