Quantum random access memory (QRAM) is a common architecture resource for algorithms with many proposed applications, including quantum chemistry, windowed quantum arithmetic, unstructured search, machine learning, and quantum cryptography. Here, we propose two bucket-brigade QRAM architectures based on high-coherence superconducting resonators, which differ in their realizations of the conditional-routing operations. In the first, we directly construct cavity-controlled controlled-<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><a:mrow><a:mstyle mathsize="0.85em"><a:mi>SWAP</a:mi></a:mstyle></a:mrow></a:math> (<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><e:mrow><e:mstyle mathsize="0.85em"><e:mi>CSWAP</e:mi></e:mstyle></e:mrow></e:math>) operations, while in the second, we utilize the properties of giant-unidirectional emitters (GUEs). For both architectures, we analyze single- and dual-rail implementations of a bosonic qubit. In the single-rail encoding, we can detect first-order ancilla errors, while the dual-rail encoding additionally allows for the detection of photon losses. For parameter regimes of interest, the postselected infidelity of a QRAM query in a dual-rail architecture is nearly an order of magnitude below that of a corresponding query in a single-rail architecture. These findings suggest that dual-rail encodings are particularly attractive as architectures for QRAM devices in the era before fault tolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: