Background Clinical examination is the final step for the assessment of a candidate in the Fellowship of College of Physicians and Surgeons-II exam and several stressors are associated with it. After a certain level, the stressors and myths related to this exam increase the chances of poor performance. This study aimed to identify the shortcomings of candidates' short and long cases with suggestions for improvement. Methodology This qualitative research with a thematic analysis approach was conducted at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan, Regional Center, Lahore. The data were collected from 20 examiners who assessed 88 candidates' short and long cases of dermatology through observation and cross-questioning. Results The major themes that emerged with more subcategories were poor history taking, poor examination, and poor time management while updated knowledge, rationalization, and enhancement of presentation skills were also highlighted in long cases. The major suggestions to improve the short and long cases were to focus on the command given, maintain the privacy of the patient, and improve training. Conclusions This study highlighted many major shortcomings the candidates showed while performing the long and short cases which may facilitate the forthcoming candidates to avoid these weaknesses by following the suggestions for improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeeshan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: