Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-cell/nuclei RNA sequencing (sc/snRNA-Seq) is widely used for profiling cell-type gene expressions in biomedical research. An important but underappreciated issue is the quality of sc/snRNA-Seq data that would impact the reliability of downstream analyses. Here we evaluated the precision and accuracy in 18 sc/snRNA-Seq datasets. The precision was assessed on data from human brain studies with a total of 3,483,905 cells from 297 individuals, by utilizing technical replicates. The accuracy was evaluated with sample-matched scRNA-Seq and pooled-cell RNA-Seq data of cultured mononuclear phagocytes from four species. The results revealed low precision and accuracy at the single-cell level across all evaluated data. Cell number and RNA quality were highlighted as two key factors determining the expression precision, accuracy, and reproducibility of differential expression analysis in sc/snRNA-Seq. This study underscores the necessity of sequencing enough high-quality cells per cell type per individual, preferably in the hundreds, to mitigate noise in expression quantification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: