Abstract Cu-1.33Ni-1.35Sn-0.08P(Ni/Sn = 1/1), Cu-0.87Ni-1.82Sn-0.08P (Ni/Sn = 1/2) and Cu-1.78Ni-0.86Sn-0.08P (Ni/Sn = 2/1) alloys were prepared to explore the effect of different Ni/Sn ratios on the microstructure and properties of the alloys. The results showed that the alloy had the best properties when Ni/Sn = 1/2. At peak aging, its tensile strength and conductivity reached 447.3 MPa and 35.5% IACS respectively. Its tensile strength was 65.1 MPa and 88.8 MPa higher than that of the alloys with Ni/Sn = 1/1 and Ni/Sn = 2/1 respectively, and its conductivity was 1.1% IACS and 3.9% IACS higher. All three alloys had obvious dendrite segregation, but the alloy with Ni/Sn = 1/2 had finer dendrites and a more uniform distribution. In addition, the precipitates in the Cu-Ni-Sn-P alloys with Ni/Sn = 1/2 and Ni/Sn = 1/1 were all granular Ni₁₂P₅ phases, and the particles of the former are finer. The precipitates in the Cu-Ni-Sn-P alloy with Ni/Sn = 2/1 were rod-shaped. The strengthening mechanisms of the three alloys were Orowan strengthening, grain boundary strengthening, solid solution strengthening and dislocation strengthening, and Orowan strengthening was dominant. The Cu-Ni-Sn-P alloy with Ni/Sn = 1/2 had finer grains and precipitates, resulting in better tensile strength and electrical conductivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: