This analysis improves amplitude estimations and seismic interpretation of dipping structures, suggesting enhanced accuracy.
Summary We developed a new amplitude correction method for receiver function imaging to analyze velocity contrasts along dipping interfaces. Because receiver function imaging typically assumes a horizontally layered structure, corrections are needed for amplitude and polarity variations of P-to-S converted phases when analyzing dipping interfaces. However, previous studies have not adequately addressed these effects, and improved receiver function analysis is required to better delineate dipping structures, such as subducting plate surfaces and the oceanic Moho. Therefore, we propose formulae that quantify converted S-wave amplitude variations between horizontal and dipping interfaces. This relationship is expressed as a function of the back azimuth, the ray parameter of an incident P wave, and the dip angle and dip direction of a dipping interface, and in this study, the geometry of the dipping interface (dip angle and dip direction) is assumed. We applied these formulae to receiver function imaging using synthetic and observed data and confirmed that the amplitude of seismic discontinuities was successfully reproduced. This method enables the use of numerous receiver functions regardless of the back azimuths of incident P waves, thereby providing more detailed amplitude estimations for dipping interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: