Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aerial grasping using flying robots necessitates gripper designs that can accommodate position/orientation errors to grasp different objects. This study investigates two bistable gripper designs that can automatically close upon contacting an object. Both grippers leverage pre-stressed spring steel bands (PSSB), with one having a single PSSB and the other having two PSSBs in a cross-shape. Both grippers can be opened with a single motor to drive a cable system routed through flexible joints on the bands. The same cable system, together with a friction adjustment mechanism, also ensures sequential closing of the gripper. We conduct experiments to evaluate and compare the gripping performance of both designs. On average, the single-band gripper can grasp within 0.14 s and open in 3 s, while the cross-shaped gripper takes 0.24 s and 4 s, respectively. Both designs can still grasp even when a cylinder makes off-center contact with the PSSB, up to a displacement of 50 mm. Further tests demonstrate both grippers can grasp cylinders with different diameters that approach the gripper with different orientations. Finally, we demonstrate both grippers can grasp real-world objects (e.g., water bottles, video game controllers, etc.). Our grippers, with their compact, lightweight design and passive grasping capabilities, hold the potential to advance aerial grasping for diverse applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: