This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Induction heating of composite materials is of great interest in fields such as controlled polymer curing or degradation, self-healing or contactless joining. Ferrimagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (IONPs) are suitable candidates for a powder additive to provide this indictive heating functionality, while being low-cost, abundant and a well-studied material class. Varying IONP size, morphology or doping facilitate fine-tune heating properties. However, the interactions of such IONP additives in material composites are often neglected and can significantly alter the induction heating mechanism. In this work, we systematically vary the IONP interactions in polydimethylsiloxane composite materials by integrating 1.) dispersed IONPs 2.) supraparticles of IONPs (micrometer-assemblies), and 3.) oven-dried hard agglomerated IONPs. Additionally, these three levels of interaction are investigated for three different IONPs types (dodecahedrally and octahedrally shaped, as well as cobalt-doped). In general, dispersed IONPs reveal a broader hysteresis and therefor a faster heating curve. We highlight that not only IONP characteristics (size, morphology, doping), but also excitation field strength and foremost IONP interactions in the composite materials are parameters that are interdependent regarding induction heating and need to be considered as such for optimization in an application-oriented scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raczka et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: