Developing carbon-coated iron oxide nanoparticles enhances magnetic performance in cancer therapy, suggesting new therapeutic possibilities.
We report the development of carbon-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs@C) core–shell nanoparticles that harness an eco-friendly synthesis to achieve outstanding magnetic and thermal performance for magnetic hyperthermia with applications in cancer therapy. Comprehensive characterization via transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and complementary spectroscopic techniques has unveiled a notable nanostructural evolution: the pristine IONPs particles (M1) exhibit an average size of 15 ± 8 nm, which notably expands to 31 ± 9 nm upon carbon coating (M2). This structural transformation, marked by preserved crystallinity in cubic spinel configuration, directly correlates with a significant boost in magnetic performance. Notably, saturation magnetization increases from 121 emu/g Fe to 128 emu/g Fe , while the specific absorption rate (SAR) escalates from 232 to 502 W/g Fe under an alternating magnetic field of 260 kHz and 52 kA/m. Our results reveal that combining eco-friendly synthesis with comprehensive structural analysis not only generates nanomaterials of exceptional performance, but also opens up new paths for groundbreaking therapeutic innovations through advancements in condensed matter approaches. • • Amorphous carbon coating significantly enhances the magnetic response of iron oxide nanoparticles by reducing surface spin disorder. • • A clear correlation between interfacial structure, saturation magnetization, and radio-frequency magnetic losses is experimentally demonstrated. • • Carbon-coated nanoparticles exhibit up to a twofold increase in specific absorption rate under identical alternating magnetic field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkady et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: