Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems offer promise in improving glycemic outcomes for individuals with type 1 diabetes. However, data on those who struggle with suboptimal glycemic levels despite insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are limited. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of an AID system in this population. Methods: Participants with hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) ≥ 58 mmol/mol (7.5%) were allocated 1:1 to 14 weeks of treatment with the MiniMed 780G system (AID) or continuation of usual care (UC). The primary endpoint was change in time in range (TIR: 3·9-10·0 mmol/L) from baseline to week 14. After this trial period, the UC group switched to AID treatment while the AID group continued using the system. Both groups were monitored for a total of 28 weeks. Results: Forty adults (mean ± SD: age 52 ± 11 years, HbA 1c 67 ± 7 mmol/mol 8.3% ± 0.6%, diabetes duration 29 ±13 years) were included. After 14 weeks, TIR increased by 18.7% (95% confidence interval CI = 14.5, 22.9%) in the AID group and remained unchanged in the UC group ( P < .0001). Hemoglobin A 1c decreased by 10.0 mmol/mol (95% CI = 7.0, 13.0 mmol/mol) (0.9% 95% CI = 0.6%, 1.2%) in the AID group but remained unchanged in the UC group ( P < .0001). The glycemic benefits of AID treatment were reproduced after the 14-week extension phase. There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis during the study. Conclusions: For adults with type 1 diabetes not meeting glycemic targets despite use of insulin pump and CGM, transitioning to an AID system confers considerable glycemic benefits.
Christensen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.