Existing multiple kernel clustering (MKC) algorithms have two ubiquitous problems. From the theoretical perspective, most MKC algorithms lack sufficient theoretical analysis, especially the consistency of learned parameters, such as the kernel weights. From the practical perspective, the high complexity makes MKC unable to handle large-scale datasets. This paper tries to address the above two issues. We first make a consistency analysis of an influential MKC method named Simple Multiple Kernel <tex-math notation="LaTeX">k</tex-math> -Means (SimpleMKKM). Specifically, suppose that <tex-math notation="LaTeX">γ ̂ₙ</tex-math> are the kernel weights learned by SimpleMKKM from the training samples. We also define the expected version of SimpleMKKM and denote its solution as <tex-math notation="LaTeX">γ ^*</tex-math> . We establish an upper bound of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">γ ̂ₙ-γ ^* _∞</tex-math> in the order of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">O(1/√n)</tex-math> , where <tex-math notation="LaTeX">n</tex-math> is the sample number. Based on this result, we also derive its excess clustering risk calculated by a standard clustering loss function. For the large-scale extension, we replace the eigen decomposition of SimpleMKKM with singular value decomposition (SVD). Consequently, the complexity can be decreased to <tex-math notation="LaTeX">O(n)</tex-math> such that SimpleMKKM can be implemented on large-scale datasets. We then deduce several theoretical results to verify the approximation ability of the proposed SVD-based method. The results of comprehensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method. The code is publicly available at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/weixuan-liang/SVD-based-SimpleMKKM</uri> .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: