Molecular sensibilization patterns have not been yet described for the Russian population, which makes it difficult to develop prevention, elimination and treatment methods for patients with allergic pathology. The purpose of this research was to analyze patterns of sensibilization to components of fur animal allergens in patients examined in order to exclude the sensibilization. Materials and methods used: results of 1113 Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) in patients with suspected atopy were analyzed. In all patients, sIgE concentrations to allergenic components of fur animals were determined. Results: 468 (58.21%) of 1113 were found to have sensibilization to fur animal allergens. Of these, 396 (84.62%) were sensibilized to the cat, 277 (59.19%) to the dog, 98 (20.94%) to the horse, and 26 (5.55%) to the mouse. sIgE to Fel d 1 was determined in 90.91% of patients with cat sensibilization, and the median concentration of sIgE to Fel d 1 was higher than to Fel d 2 (p=0.011) and Fel d 4 (p<0.001) (5.4 [1,7; 15]). ISU-E, sIgE to Can f 1 was detected in 73.29%, to Can f 2 - in 18.05%, to Can f 5 - in 41.52% of patients sensibilized to dogs. Among children under 9 y/o, the frequency of detection of sensitization to Can f 5 was less frequent than in the group of children aged over 10 y/o and adults (p<0.001). Conclusion: the Russian population is characterized by a high prevalence of sensibilization to fur animal allergens. Most patients had polysensibilization to components of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1, 2 and 5) allergens. It was revealed that Can f 2 has a higher allergenic potential, which in its turn allows it to be identified as a major dog allergen. 92.55% of patients with sensibilization to Fur-bearing animals have an increased risk of developing asthma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhukalina et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: