to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir compared to oral oseltamivir for pediatric influenza by a method of meta-analysis. Clinical trials involving intravenous peramivir versus oral oseltamivir therapy in children with influenza were searched from six databases until July 2023. Data were processed using Stata 15.0 software. Seven published articles were identified in this review. The combined results exhibited that the clinical effective rate in the peramivir group (76.09%) was higher than that in the oseltamivir group (58.85%) (RR= 1.12, 95%CI: 1.01∼1.24, P= 0.038). The incidence of adverse reactions in the peramivir group (13.31%) was lower than that in the oseltamivir group (17.34%) (RR= 0.77, 95%CI: 0.61-0.96, P= 0.023). Compared with the oseltamivir group, the peramivir group had lower recovery time of body temperature (WMD= -19.81, 95%CI: -27.58∼-12.04, P < 0.001). compared with oral oseltamivir, intravenous peramivir has better efficacy and higher safety for pediatric influenza.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: