Purpose : To determine between-limbs differences in isometric rate of force development (RFD) measured during open- (OKC) and closed-kinetic-chain (CKC) strength testing and establish which method had the strongest relationship to single-leg vertical-jump performance and knee mechanics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods : Subjects (n = 19) 1 to 5 years from ACL reconstruction performed isometric knee extensions (OKC), unilateral isometric midthigh pulls (CKC), and single-leg vertical jumps on the ACL-involved and -noninvolved limbs. Between-limbs differences were assessed using paired t tests, and the relationship between RFD, jump performance, and knee mechanics was assessed using correlation coefficients ( r ; P ≤ .05). Results : There were significant between-limbs differences in OKC RFD ( P = .008, d = −0.69) but not CKC RFD. OKC RFD in the ACL-involved limb had a strong association with jump height ( r = .64, P = .003), knee-joint power ( r = .72, P < .001), and peak knee-flexion angle ( r = .72, P = .001). CKC RFD in the ACL-involved limb had a strong association with jump height ( r = .65, P = .004) and knee-joint power ( r = .67, P = .002) but not peak knee-flexion angle ( r = .40, P = .09). Conclusions : While both OKC and CKC RFD were strongly related to jump performance and knee-joint power, OKC RFD was able to detect between-limbs RFD asymmetries and was strongly related to knee-joint kinematics. These findings indicate that isometric knee extension may be optimal for assessing RFD after ACL reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: