This study examines patterns of interorganizational collaboration for hazard mitigation in metropolitan regions. Metropolitan regions whose populations reside in vulnerable places may experience extreme events. Facilitation of collective actions among organizations is critical for building resilient urban communities. Although the literature highlights the importance of interorganizational collaboration in disaster management, patterns of interorganizational collaboration for hazard mitigation in urban settings has been underexamined. Building on an institutional collective action framework, this study argues that hazard mitigation efforts tend to be localized. We tested this hypothesis using survey data collected in the Busan and Ulsan metropolitan regions, where natural disasters are problematic. An exponential random graph model confirmed the presence of a bonding strategy, which builds trust with municipalities and organizations within the region and creates interorganizational collaboration. We found that local public agencies tend to collaborate with organizations in the same jurisdictions or at higher levels of government.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: