This study examines how K-12 teachers (n=248) in the United States evaluated multiple ethical propositions grounded within classic philosophic distinction of deontology and consequentialism. Notably, we observed gender differences in ethical evaluations, with women scoring higher in several deontological propositions. Furthermore, teachers' attitudes significantly predicted their stances on consequentialist propositions, while self-efficacy and anxiety were related to both consequentialist and deontological perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: