A persistent dilemma in building energy modeling consists of finding the proper trade-off between accurate results, data availability and limited modeling effort. In fact, quasi-steady state models require a limited number of inputs, however providing often rough results; dynamic tools are instead usually very accurate but involve a huge effort to obtain all the needed information and implementing it into the tool. In this context, we propose a simplified dynamic model for building heating and cooling demand estimation on a daily basis, according to the assessment of all the involved heat transfer mechanisms of the thermal zone. The required inputs are limited and comparable to those needed for other quasi-steady state models, but three tuning coefficients allow the simulation to be performed at the daily time scale. The proposed tool is here successfully tested on a wide set of test cases, differing for building structure, external climate, and occupants' profile. In addition, reliable results are provided also in case of multi-year application and availability of a little amount of data for calibration, with average errors typically below 10% in daily cooling and heating energy requirement estimation, compared to benchmark demands. Finally, an example of application explores the application field of the tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schito et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: