Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Failure analysis is important especially for the reliability of electronic components. Low failure probabilities and high dimensional input parameter spaces, including for example also manufacturing tolerances, usually require an unfeasible number of simulations and/or experiments to reach a high degree of certainty, at least when taking Monte-Carlo or similar approaches. With Robust Design Optimization we can study, as presented in this paper, the transition region between failure and non-failure very efficiently. For many applications, like Physical Health Management in combination with Digital Twins, information especially about the transition region from non-failure to failure is very important. This information must be passed along the value chain while keeping IP non-disclosed. This can be appropriately done using metamodels of failure probabilities (fragility surfaces).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niemeier et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: