We have phenomenologically investigated the decays Bₛ⁰ → X(3872) π⁺π⁻ (K⁺ K⁻) and Bₛ⁰ → ψ(2S) π⁺ π⁻ (K⁺K⁻). In our analysis, the scalar meson f₀(980) is formed through the final state interactions of coupled channels π π and KK̄. Our findings indicate that the π⁺π⁻ invariant mass distribution of the Bₛ⁰ → ψ(2S)π⁺π⁻ decay can be accurately reproduced. Furthermore, we have explored the π⁺π⁻ (K⁺ K⁻) invariant mass distribution of the Bₛ⁰ → X(3872) π⁺π⁻ (K⁺ K⁻) decay, accounting for the different production mechanisms between $X(3872)$ and ψ(2S), up to a global factor. It is found that the production rates for $X(3872)$ and ψ(2S) are much different, which indicates that the structure of $X(3872)$ is more complicated than the ψ(2S), which is a conventional cc̄ state. Additionally, we have considered the contributions from f₀(1500) to π⁺π⁻ and the φ meson to K⁺ K⁻ in our analysis. Utilizing the model parameters, we have calculated the branching fraction of Bₛ⁰ → X(3872) K⁺ K⁻, and anticipate that the findings of our study can be experimentally tested in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: