This article presents single- and multi-disciplinary shape optimizations of a generic business jet wing at two transonic cruise flow conditions. The studies performed are based on two high-fidelity gradient-based optimization tools, assisted by the adjoint method (following both discrete and continuous approaches). Single discipline and coupled multi-disciplinary sensitivity derivatives computed from the two tools are compared and verified against finite differences. The importance of not making the frozen turbulence assumption in adjoint-based optimization is demonstrated. Then, a number of optimization runs, ranging from a pure aerodynamic with a rigid structure to an aerostructural one exploring the trade-offs between the involved disciplines, are presented and discussed. The middle-ground scenario of optimizing the wing with aerodynamic criteria and, then, performing an aerostructural trimming is also investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Τσιάκας et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: