In this research, the contribution of a highly productive minority of scientists to the national Polish research output over the past three decades (1992-2021) is explored. Four classes of top performers (the upper 1%, 3%, 5%, and 10%) are examined using four productivity measurements. A temporal stability of productivity patterns is found: the upper 1% of scientists, on average, account for 10% of the national output, and the upper 10% account for almost 50% of total output, with significant disciplinary variations. The 1/10 and the 10/50 rules consistently apply across the three decades studied. The Relative Presence Index (RPI) we constructed shows that men are over-represented in all top performers classes. Top performers are studied longitudinally through their detailed publishing histories, with micro-data coming from the raw Scopus dataset. Econometric models identify the three most important predictors changing the odds ratio estimates of membership in top performance classes: gender, academic age, and publishing patterns. The downward trend in fixed effects over successive six-year periods indicates increasing competition in academia. A large population of internationally visible Polish scientists (N=152,043) with their 587,558 articles is studied. Implications for high productivity studies are shown, and limitations are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwiek et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: