One-way state generators (OWSG) are natural quantum analogs to classical one-way functions. We show that O(n/log(n))-copy OWSGs (n represents the input length) are equivalent to $poly(n)$-copy OWSG and to quantum commitments. Since known results show that o(n/log(n))-copy OWSG cannot imply commitments, this shows that O(n/log(n))-copy OWSGs are the weakest OWSGs from which we can get commitments (and hence much of quantum cryptography). Our construction follows along the lines of H{a}stad, Impagliazzo, Levin and Luby [HILL], who obtained classical pseudorandom generators (PRG) from classical one-way functions (OWF), however with crucial modifications. Our construction, when applied to the classical case, provides an alternative to the construction provided by [HILL]. Since we do not argue conditioned on the output of the one-way function, our construction and analysis are arguably simpler and may be of independent interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: