How do we know whether psychological science generalizes across groups? Psychometrics, including the nomological network, are key for establishing the validity of psychological constructs in under-investigated populations. We used an online, monthly longitudinal study measuring personality, social relationships, and mental health. Among participants (total N=1,777; 31% retention), 73% identified as sexual and/or gender minority (SGM). Longitudinal growth parameters, rank-order stability, and cross-lagged correlations were examined. The findings showed remarkably similar associations and rank-order stability. Mean differences measured using multiple assessments displayed a similar pattern to cross-sectional with slightly diminished magnitudes. These exploratory results can inform longitudinal research to be better equipped to disentangle processes that support resilience in the face of extant negative influences, address health disparities, and identify associations that are more universal in the studied contexts lending support for diversifying psychological research across SGM identities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junkins et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: