A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol

Laurna Bullock; Elaine Nicholls; Andrea Cherrington; Stephanie Butler-Walley; Emma Clark; Jane Fleming; Sarah Leyland; Ida Bentley; Simon H. L. Thomas; Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia; David C. Webb; Jo Smith; Sarah Bathers; Sarah Lewis; Angela Clifford; Michele Siciliano; Joanne Protheroe; Sarah Ryan; Janet Lefroy; Nicky Dale; Ashley Hawarden; S Connacher; Robert Horne; Terence W O’Neill; Christian Mallen; Clare Jinks; Zoé Paskins

doi:10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1

Abstract

Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person's life, beliefs, and values. We developed the

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Bullock et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70b3ab6db643587684e23 https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading