Studies of the effects of immigration on redistribution preferences mostly focus on Western countries and neglect the South-South contexts. However, we argue that immigration shocks may have different effects in South-South regions. On the one hand, the effect should be more muted due to the minimal cultural differences and the limited development of the welfare state. On the other hand, the impact might be even larger due to high inequality and scarce resources. To investigate this, we exploit the 2015 Venezuelan immigration shock in Colombia using a shift-share instrument and an event study, finding non-significant effects. Moreover, a survey experiment reveals that priming citizens on immigration has null-to-positive effects on redistribution preferences. We attribute this to deservingness considerations, due to cultural similarities between Venezuelan immigrants and the host population. These results challenge prevailing theories and suggest that increased immigration does not necessarily reduce redistribution preferences in South-South contexts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serrano-Serrat et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: