Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Different slope geohazards have different causal mechanisms. This study aims to propose a method to investigate the decision-making mechanisms for the susceptibility of different slope geohazards. The study includes a geospatial dataset consisting of 1203 historical slope geohazard units, including slope creeps, shallow slides, rockfalls and debris flows, and 584 non-geohazard units, and 22 initial condition factors. Following a 7:3 ratio, the data were randomly divided into a test set and a training set, and an ensemble SMOTE-RF-SHAP model was constructed. The performance and generalization ability of the model were evaluated by confusion matrix and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the four types of geohazards. The decision-making mechanism of different geohazards was then identified and investigated using the SHAP explanatory model. The results show that the hybrid optimization improves the overall accuracy of the model from 0.486 to 0.831, with significant enhancements in the prediction accuracy for all four types of slope geohazards, as well as reductions in misclassification and omission rates. Furthermore, this study reveals that the main influencing factors and spatiotemporal distribution of different slope geohazards exhibit high similarity, while the impacts of individual factors and different factor values on different slope geohazards demonstrate significant differences. For example, long and persistent rainfall can erode rock masses and lead to slope creep, increased rainfall may trigger shallow mountain landslides, and sudden surface runoff can even cause debris flows. These findings have important practical implications for slope disaster risk management.
Huang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.