This article explores dignity and vulnerability in qualitative research with irregular migrants, highlighting their agency.
Discussions on the conduct of research among individuals who reside in a place without legal status – widely referred to as irregular migrants – have long engaged with the ethical dilemmas that this work entails. Typically, this is done in relation to the perceived vulnerability of research participants. This article is the product of a collaborative reflection on methodological aspects of qualitative research with a population widely perceived and described as ‘vulnerable’. We aim to foreground dignity methodologically to better understand how irregularised migrants both encounter and struggle against the label of vulnerability; how, perhaps, research can play a role in acknowledging the dignity of individuals who have repeatedly experienced ‘vulnerabilisation’ in their migration journeys. Re-positioning individuals often framed as ‘vulnerable’ instead as ‘experts’, we put forward a methodological roadmap to critically engage with the concept of vulnerability in migration research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannetto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: