The maximum permissible concentration (m.p.c.) of Cu 2+ ions in drinking water, as set by the World Health Organization (WHO) is m.p.c. (Cu 2+ ) WHO = 30 × 10 −6 m , whereas the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes a more restrictive value of m.p.c. (Cu 2+ ) EPA = 20 × 10 −6 m . Herein, for the first time ever, a family of m.p.c. (Cu 2+ ) “visual” pass/fail sensors is developed based on water‐soluble lanthanide‐containing single‐chain nanoparticles (SCNPs) exhibiting an average hydrodynamic diameter less than 10 nm. Both europium (Eu)‐ and terbium (Tb)‐based SCNPs allow excessive Cu 2+ to be readily detected in water, as indicated by the red‐to‐transparent and green‐to‐transparent changes, respectively, under UV light irradiation, occurring at 30 × 10 −6 m Cu 2+ in both cases. Complementary, dysprosium (Dy)‐based SCNPs show a yellow color‐to‐transparent transition under UV light irradiation at ≈15 × 10 −6 m Cu 2+ . Eu‐, Tb‐, and Dy‐containing SCNPs prove to be selective for Cu 2+ ions as they do not respond against other metal ions, such as Fe 2+ , Ag + , Co 2+ , Ba 2+ , Ni 2+ , Hg 2+ , Pb 2+ , Zn 2+ , Fe 3+ , Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , Mg 2+ , or Cr 3+ . These new m.p.c. (Cu 2+ ) “visual” pass/fail sensors are thoroughly characterized by a combination of techniques, including size exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry, as well as infrared, UV, and fluorescence spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinacho‐Olaciregui et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: